Reporting, documents, and investigations involving Air Force, connected across UFOPress coverage and its evidence graph.
A tranche-by-tranche review of the Pentagon's 2026 PURSUE releases and the National Archives' parallel UAP collection finds most material was previously known, some is newly official confirmation of long-suspected Cold War doctrine, and a meaningful slice — including congressionally demanded videos — simply isn't there.
A chain of researchers — Bill Chalker, George Pedley, Shane Ryan — has quietly assembled a picture of the 1966 Tully UFO incident that Australia's official investigators never completed. At its center is a newly surfaced letter from a credible friend of the Prime Minister, raising a pointed question about why the RAAF never spoke to the man who started everything.
Decades after the Majestic 12 documents first surfaced, they remain unverified — yet they keep reappearing at the center of serious UAP conversations. The question isn't whether they're real. It's why credible people keep refusing to call them fake.
As the body of a Los Alamos lab worker is found in a New Mexico forest, former FBI officials and sitting members of Congress are raising questions about whether her disappearance is part of a broader pattern involving scientists with access to sensitive national security programs — a pattern the government has not officially acknowledged.
Five declassified U.S. Central Command mission reports, released via war.gov, document UAP observations by Air Force ISR crews operating over Syria, Greece, and the Middle East between October 2020 and January 2024 — each report approved for release to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office.
The Trump administration's February 2026 executive order to declassify UAP files has produced a cascade of releases — but the most revealing document so far may be a 1966 FBI memo tracking a flying saucer magazine for Communist sympathies, a reminder that the government's longest-running interest in UFOs has always been as much about domestic politics as about the sky.
Two of the most prominent voices in the UAP disclosure movement — physicist Eric Davis and former Pentagon official Christopher Mellon — have staked credibility on crash cases that veteran UFO investigator Kevin Randle says are built on fabricated testimony and phantom witnesses. The pattern raises a question no one in the disclosure community wants to answer: if these men have genuine classified access, why do they keep endorsing cases that fall apart under basic scrutiny?