The full record, newest first.
Former intelligence officer David Grusch testified under oath that the U.S. government has recovered non-human craft and biological material. Official agencies say they have found no evidence to support that claim. Both cannot be right.
The Trump administration's February 2026 executive order to declassify UAP files has produced a cascade of releases — but the most revealing document so far may be a 1966 FBI memo tracking a flying saucer magazine for Communist sympathies, a reminder that the government's longest-running interest in UFOs has always been as much about domestic politics as about the sky.
The Defense Department's release of a second wave of UAP records is a verifiable government act. What gets built on top of it — claims about TR-3B craft, Nordic extraterrestrials, and covert missions from Eglin Air Force Base — is something else entirely, and the distance between those two things is the story.
The Trump White House has handed a polarizing Harvard astronomer significant influence over the government's UFO inquiry, even as the Pentagon's own investigative office maintains it has found no evidence of alien life — a contradiction that sits at the center of the new UAP apparatus.
The Defense Department released a second batch of previously classified UFO files in late May 2026, drawing 340 million web hits and a familiar mix of curiosity and skepticism — with Rep. Eric Burlison calling the first wave low-hanging fruit and at least one disclosure advocate warning the releases could backfire on the Trump administration.
Ross Coulthart and Tim Gallaudet are raising alarms that the Trump administration's rolling UFO file releases may amount to managed disappointment — blurry videos and bureaucratic gestures — rather than the structural disclosure the UAP community has demanded for years.
When the Trump administration released its long-anticipated UFO files, the reaction split sharply: some saw genuine new detail, others called it a disappointment. The gap between what was promised and what was delivered is itself a story worth examining.
The Trump administration has created a White House-backed UAP Science Advisory Council led by Harvard physicist Avi Loeb — but former intelligence officials and congressional insiders are alleging that the most significant evidence never made it into public releases.
The blog ufos-disclosure.blogspot.com aggregates credentialed UAP researchers alongside channelers and prophetic claims, presenting all of it under the same rhetorical roof — and that blurring deserves scrutiny.
Two of the most prominent voices in the UAP disclosure movement — physicist Eric Davis and former Pentagon official Christopher Mellon — have staked credibility on crash cases that veteran UFO investigator Kevin Randle says are built on fabricated testimony and phantom witnesses. The pattern raises a question no one in the disclosure community wants to answer: if these men have genuine classified access, why do they keep endorsing cases that fall apart under basic scrutiny?